Why Real Estate Is a Smart Investment (Unless You Have Rich Parents)

Why Real Estate is a Smart Investment

There are lots of ways to financial freedom. The fastest and easiest is to be born to rich parents.

According to economists, about 60 percent of the wealth in America now comes through inheritance. But if you, like me, weren’t lucky enough to be born to rich parents (or find some to adopt you), don’t despair. We “60-Percenters” have other methods to financial freedom. We can climb (or should I say “claw”) our way up the corporate ladder, invest in stocks or bonds or mutual funds, write a bestselling novel or win the lottery.

But earning a top executive position in a corporation can take a long time. Stocks can be volatile. Bonds, annuities and mutual funds often offer less than satisfactory returns. Writing a novel is hard work and only a few make The New York Times bestselling lists. And the lottery — well, your odds of striking it big are 1,800 times less than being killed by lightning strike.

Each “wealth stream” has advantages over the others. (Lottery tickets are cheap.) But none has a better track record than real estate, especially multi-unit rental properties. Since 1940, apartment communities, like homes, have appreciated in value about six percent a year. Monthly rental rates have appreciated about nine percent a year. Adjusted for inflation, rents have increased nearly five-fold, from an average of about $250 a month to a whopping $1,200.

This appreciation in property values and rent means that you have a built-in hedge against inflation, plus some. Although stocks prices have increased faster in value than homes and rents (about 10 percent a year since the 1930s), stocks lack cash flow (like the profit from monthly rent checks). In fact, when compared side-by-side, real estate outperforms stocks by a wide margin.

I’ll prove it to you.

Let’s begin with two investors, each of whom has $22,000 to invest. One puts his money into stocks, which, as I’ve noted earlier, increases an average of 10 percent per year. At the end of the first year, that initial investment of $22,000 (subtracting $100 for the cost of initially placing the order to purchase the stocks through an online investment site), grows to $24,090 — a $2,190 increase. At the end of ten years (interest is compounded from year to year), the total investment grows to $56,803 — a 158 percent return on investment (ROI = [gain from investment – cost of investment] ÷ cost of investment).

That’s a pretty good ROI.

But watch what happens when the other investor puts her money into real estate. She purchases a $100,000 rental property. Two thousand dollars goes into closing costs, and the remaining $20,000 goes to the down payment.

Because property increases at an average rate of six percent per year, after one year, her investment is now worth $6,000 more (six percent x $100,000). That’s $3,810 more than the $2,190 increase for the other investor.

But her gains do not stop there.

The average national rental rate for a $100,000 unit is $1,000 per month (rates are generally one percent of property value). The monthly mortgage payment for a 30-year fixed-interest mortgage at six percent interest is about $480. According to industry standards, the average expenses for a unit like this are about $235 a month. This leaves a cash flow, or profit, of $275 per month. So this investor’s first year cash flow will be $3,300. She has earned $9,300 so far.

But there’s more.

The rent covers her mortgage payment, part of which pays off the principal. This creates equity for her. After the first year, the equity from principle is $982. So now we can add it all up. Her total net gain or profit in the first year is $10,282, nearly five times as much as the other stock investor, who earned $2,190. At the end of her first year, her total investment is now worth $30,282 ($20,000 down payment + $6,000 in appreciation + $3,300 in cash flow + $982 in principle equity), compared with $24,090 for the stock investor.

Wow! But there’s even more.

Because rent increases at a rate of about nine percent a year, her rental payments will continue to increase through the years, offering her another hedge against inflation and more profits, as inflation usually is less than four percent per year. The graph above summarizes what I’ve just discussed.

At the end of the 10-year time period, the stock investor’s ROI is $56,803, or 158 percent, and the real estate investor’s ROI is a whopping $162,262, or 638 percent. So, if you owned just six small rental properties, you could become a millionaire in 10 years.

With an investment strategy like this, who needs rich parents?

About The Author

Ken McElroy is the co-partner of MC Companies in Scottsdale, Ariz. He is the author of the best-selling books, The ABC's of Real Estate Investing, The Advanced Guide to Real Estate Investing, and The ABC's of Property Management. McElroy is also a contributor for The Real Book of Real Estate by Robert Kioysaki, and The Midas Touch by Donald Trump and Robert Kiyosaki. McElroy's fourth book, The Sleeping Giant, is dedicated to the new class of entrepreneurs who are emerging in today's economy. For editorial consideration please contact editor@jetsetmag(dot)com.

Related Posts